As the national debate over the appointment of Chief Justice Edi Faal continues to dominate political and legal discourse, one voice remains noticeably absent: that of renowned UK based Gambian barrister and solicitor Melville Robertson Roberts.
Known for his forthright opinions on constitutional law, governance and judicial reform, Roberts has, on this occasion, maintained an unusual silence despite growing public interest in his views. Is his silence strategic, deliberate, or simply a reflection of his belief that some legal issues deserve careful consideration before public comment?
With many eagerly awaiting his perspective, the question remains: Why has Melville Robertson Roberts chosen not to weigh in, at least for now?
